| |
|
|
| |
5
|
|
September 30-October 6, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Hilton Cebu
Resort & Spa Grants Assistance to the
Gawad Kalinga Foundation
|
Hilton in the Community Foundation
donated PhP1.4 million to Gawad Kalinga
Foundation to help rebuild the nation
after the most recent calamity that
struck the Philippines, specifically the
Bicol and Marinduque provinces.
Hilton Cebu Resort & Spa’s corporate social responsibility arm
identified two Gawad Kalinga projects in
the Bicol region: Taysan and Daraga in
Legazpi City, Albay and Anislag. The
funds are to be divested to construct
and rehabilitate the schools where
classes were temporarily held in a tent.
“Through your help, our pre-schoolers
(children from 6-7 years old) will now
have a decent school,” said Eric Salvino,
a Gawad Kalinga volunteer.
I was moved by the damage and the magnitude of the disaster but on
the other hand, I am also impressed with
Gawad Kalinga, and even the work and
cooperation of other organizations in
the area,” said Hilton Cebu Resort & Spa
General Manager Peter Pedersen on his
personal site visit to in Legazpi City |
|

|
Hilton Cebu
Resort & Spa Senior Sales
Manager Romela Gianan, General
Manager Peter Pedersen, Gawad
Kalinga Foundation’s Executive
Director Jose Luis Quinena and
Director of Sales and Marketing
Samuel Gacos |
|
|
“Supporting Young People Worldwide” is
the mission of Hilton in the Community
Foundation. By making charitable grants,
the Foundation aims to support
activities in education and health to
equip individuals and relieve suffering.
Additionally, during times of disaster,
the Foundation aims to respond quickly
to support relief efforts. “Having seen
first hand the projects which the
foundation is helping to support, I can
assure our hardworking fundraisers and
donors that every penny is being put to
very good use,” Hilton in the Community
Foundation President Ian Carter and
Chief Executive Officer for
International Operations of the Hilton
Hotels.
Gawad Kalinga is a Philippine movement launched last 2003 which
aims to uplift poverty through holistic
program of restoring the dignity of the
Filipinos and uniting them under one
common cause—the fight against poverty.
What started as a youth program for a
religious organization has transformed
into a nation building group now on its
fourth year and rapidly increasing its
template of poverty alleviation locally.
|
|
|
Militant Groups Call
for Senate to Junk JPEPA
By Katrina N.
Cabanos
|
|
Oblivious to the scorching midday
sun, protesters from the Bukluran ng
Manggagawang Pilipino (BMP) or
Solidarity of Filipino Workers recently
filed up outside the Senate building.
Armed with banners and mega-phones,
members of the militant workers union
were bent on getting their voices heard
by legislators.
This demonstration is only one among the scores of anti-JPEPA
rallies that have assailed the Senate
since the weekly public JPEPA hearings
began. JPEPA is the Japan-Philippines
Economic Partnership Agreement, a free
trade pact entered by the Philippines
with the industrial giant. Plans have
been laid as early as December 2002 by
the former Prime Minister of Japan
Junichiro Koizumi and Philippine
President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. The
agreement that was reached after four
years of closed-door negotiations
brought about a deluge of protests from
different sectors when it was finally
signed last year.
The free trade agreement has been branded as inequitable and
unfavorable for the Philippines. Aside
from lowering tariffs it will ease
Japanese labor restrictions to make it
more accessible for Filipinos and will
liberalize investment conditions in the
Philippines for Japanese corporations.
The treaty is all encompassing, touching
issues in trade, goods, services
intellectual property and rules of
origin. Developed countries opted to
deal with these issues bilaterally when
the World Trade Organization’s Doha
Round of negotiations proved to be
fruitless.
While Japan has similar pacts with other countries, including
Singapore, Malaysia and Mexico, this is
the first bilateral trade agreement with
the Philippines. It has many key
features of the North American Free
Trade Agreement |
|
(NAFTA), except the NAFTA took ten years
to negotiate.
Both the Japanese and the Philippine government envisage favorable
results for their economies and at least
two organizations expressed their
support for JPEPA on two separate
occasions, the Federation of Philippine
Industries (FPI) and the League of
Municipalities of the Philippines (LMP).
FPI president Jesus Arranza went as far
as saying that the agreement will open
the Japan labor market to Filipino
professionals, including doctors, nurses
and engineers, and increase Japanese
investments in the country. Many are
skeptical as to whether Filipino workers
can penetrate the Japanese labor market
and benefit from Yen remittances.
Nurses, for example, would have to take
the Nursing Board Exam in Niponggo
before qualifying to work in Japan.
The militant fisherfolk group Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang
Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya)
is among the groups that are vehemently
against JPEPA. In an interview of
Information Officer Gerry Corpuz he said
that all the talk on the Philippines
profiting from the agreement is pure
propaganda. The Japanese have clearly
more to gain. “Japan can explore the
country’s exclusive economic zone and
Japan with its advance technology can
explore the territorial waters of the
Philippines for fish, particularly tuna.
The small bancas (small fishing boats)
of Filipino fishermen cannot explore the
waters of Japan because the backward
technology will not allow them to do so.
So even if we allow Japan to fish here,
and the Japanese government, for the
sake of argument allows us to fish in
Japanese territorial waters will that be
fair?” It is more evocative of a treaty
between a guppy and a shark than two
equals. |
|
|
|
Japanese Aid Spurs Speculation
By Ana Kristine
B. Valenzuela
|
|
The
Japanese fertilizers worth ¥300
million or PhP125 million were formally
turned over under the 30th Japan Grant
Assistance for Underprivileged Farmers
Program in Iloilo City. However, this
caused a local fisherfolk group
Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang
Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya)
to express consternation on the
Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership
Agreement (JPEPA) deal.
Present at the formal turnover in Iloilo City last September 6 were
Minister Akira Sugiyama and Japanese
Embassy’s Minister for Economic Affairs
and Department of Agriculture
Undersecretary and National Agricultural
and Fishery Council executive director
Bernie Fondevilla. Sugiyama remarked
that the grant epitomizes Japan’s
unwavering efforts to support the
Philippine government’s food security
program as well as provide renewed hopes
and greater livelihood opportunities for
poor Filipino farmers.
Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya),
however countered that the PhP125
million-fertilizer grant was meant to
strengthen the JPEPA on the part of the
Senate. “That’s part of the tactics of
the Japanese government. They are
providing grant aid, such as this, to
soften the position of the Senate and to
convince the Filipino people that it is
an agreement that will benefit millions
of Filipinos. This is an indirect bribe
just to accept a one-sided agreement,”
said Information Officer Gerry Corpuz.
Much hype has been committed to the Japanese grant given this year
even if Japan has been rendering
fertilizers and the like for thirty
years now. The fertilizer grant has been
allotted to farmer-beneficiaries who
could seldom meet their families’ basic
needs and whose landholdings are two
hectares or below. It has been handed
out in selected nine provinces arriving
in three separate shipments in the ports
of Bataan, Batangas and Iloilo.
“It (the grant) is to convince the senators and the Filipino public
in general that the Philippines is
gaining a lot from Japan,” said Corpuz.
“Although this kind of support has been
ongoing for thirty years since the
1970s, we believe that it is still tied
to JPEPA. Everything that Japan has
|
|
given
to the Philippines has something in
return. So, this is only part of that
continuing agreement between the
Philippines and Japan that the country
should give in to Japanese transnational
corporations in exchange for this small
grant.”
Japan has been giving grants to poor Filipino farmers since 1977. The
Philippines was one of the six countries
selected for the Grant Assistance for
Underprivileged Farmers Program
(formerly 2KR Program).
“Proceeds from the sale of the ammonium sulphate fertilizers will
be utilized to fund social development
and agriculture and fishery-related
projects that will benefit
underprivileged farmers and fisherfolk,”
Fondevilla said. “The Department of
Agriculture is targeting marginalized
farmers using certified seeds and good
seeds in irrigated and non-irrigated
upland and lowland areas in selected
provinces covered by the Ginintuang
Masaganang Ani (GMA) Rice Program of
President Arroyo as the beneficiaries of
the Japan grant.”
According to Corpuz, the Philippines will lose USD242.5 million
once Japan has been allowed to fish for
tuna, part of the deal in the JPEPA. A
beating to the promised USD100 million
for the Philippine fruits allowed for
Japanese market when the JPEPA has been
corresponded upon.
The Japanese embassy does not see it this way. “The Government of
Japan shares the view with the
Government of the Philippines that the
JPEPA will be conducive to the further
increase of trade and investment between
the two countries and thus further
promote the bilateral relations. The
Government of Japan, therefore,
sincerely hopes that the JPEPA will come
into force at the earliest possible
date,” the Japanese Embassy said in a
statement.
Furthermore, Fondevilla responded defending the fertilizer grant, “This
grant is in sync with the Department of
Agriculture’s five-point program to
boost farm productivity and ensure
greater profitability for Filipino
farmers and fisherfolk through higher
public spending on infrastructure,
technology and extension services, and
post-harvest and storage facilities;
expanding access to rural credit; and
opening more markets for Philippine farm
produce here and overseas.” |
|
|
|
| |
|
|